CONTACTUS
Live Chat
Chat now with us
Email Us
Send us an email, and we'll get back to you soon
Call Us
Reach out to us now

  Home > News >  Enterprise dynamics >  Customer Case Study: From 232ms to 158ms – How RAKsmart’s Seattle CN2 GIA Ended My Trans‑Pacific Latency Nightmare

Customer Case Study: From 232ms to 158ms – How RAKsmart’s Seattle CN2 GIA Ended My Trans‑Pacific Latency Nightmare

2026-01-15

When users from Beijing access my US-based server, the latency drops drastically from 232ms to 158ms. This isn't magic—it's the real impact of Raksmart's Seattle CN2 GIA line.

My online education platform serves users in both China and the US, and managing this dual demand used to be a technical nightmare. When students in Beijing try to access course videos hosted in Los Angeles at 8 PM, buffering was the norm. On the other hand, when engineers in Silicon Valley tried to connect to a development environment in Shanghai at 9 AM, the latency was maddening. After testing various major cloud service providers' US nodes, I was almost resigned to the fate that "cross-Pacific business will always come with subpar performance"—until I put my last hope in Raksmart's Seattle data center.

This migration not only improved the platform's performance metrics across the board, but it also gave me a new perspective on the truth that "geographical location is a strategic resource.“

1  The Latency Trap: A Business Strangled by Physical Distance
Our original architecture was “standard”: main services deployed on Alibaba Cloud’s North China node, while US‑facing services were hosted in a well‑known cloud provider’s Virginia data center. The tech team had implemented CDN, database read‑write separation, and load balancing according to best practices, but one fundamental issue remained unavoidable—network latency caused by physical distance.

From eastern China to the US East Coast, light signals alone take about 120ms one‑way. Adding routing hops and network congestion kept actual latency consistently between 220‑250ms. For real‑time interactive online classes, such delay is fatal: after a teacher asked a question, students would hear it half a second later, and the teacher would receive the answer another half‑second after that—completely disrupting the class rhythm.

What was truly frustrating was the mismatch between cost and results: we paid over $1,500 monthly for the US node, only to face user complaints and declining renewal rates. The technical team tried every optimization—protocol tuning, compression algorithms, edge‑computing nodes—yet none could break the baseline set by the laws of physics.

The turning point came when a peer recommended RAKsmart’s Seattle data center. My initial reaction was skepticism: the distance from Seattle to Beijing isn’t dramatically shorter than from Virginia—how much improvement could there be? But the test data astonished me.

2  Seattle’s Unexpected Edge: More Than Just “A Bit Closer”
The straight‑line distance from Seattle to Beijing is about 9,600 km, while Virginia‑to‑Beijing is roughly 11,000 km. That 1,400‑km difference matters in the networking world, but what counts more is routing quality, not merely distance.

I set up three test points: Beijing Telecom, Shanghai Unicom, and Shenzhen Mobile, running continuous ping and traceroute tests over one week to three US data centers:

Data Center Location

Avg Latency (Beijing)

Avg Latency (Shanghai)

Avg Latency (Shenzhen)

Packet Loss at Peak

Virginia (Standard Route)

232ms

221ms

238ms

3‑7%

Los Angeles (CN2 GT Route)

168ms

158ms

172ms

1‑2%

Seattle (CN2 GIA Route)

158ms

149ms

163ms

0.2‑0.5%

The data revealed three truths: first, Seattle does enjoy a natural geographic advantage; second, CN2 GIA (Global Internet Acceleration) line quality far surpasses ordinary international routes; third, the difference is most pronounced during evening peak hours.

RAKsmart’s Seattle routing shows that packets from Beijing enter China Telecom’s CN2 backbone directly, then cross the Pacific via a dedicated line straight to Seattle—only 12‑14 hops. Ordinary routes require 18‑22 hops through multiple international exchange points, each a potential congestion spot.

3  Beyond Low Latency: Seattle’s Holistic Value Proposition
Seattle is globally recognized by the tech industry as a strategic location of exceptional importance for cloud and data‑center service providers. Its unique advantages form a solid foundation for RAKsmart’s expansion there:

  • Home of Two Hyperscale Clouds: As the birthplace of Amazon AWS and the location of Microsoft’s headquarters (Redmond), Seattle nurtures a deep cloud‑engineering culture, making it the innovation heart and core ecosystem of global cloud computing.

  • Green Economy & Natural Cooling: Washington State offers low hydropower costs, with significant electricity‑price and carbon‑intensity advantages. At the same time, the region’s cool climate provides efficient “free‑cooling” conditions for data centers, dramatically reducing cooling energy and operational costs.

  • Trans‑Pacific Network Hub for Asia‑Pacific Connectivity: The Pacific Northwest is a critical landing point for submarine cables and backbone networks linking to Asia‑Pacific markets. Building a node here facilitates low‑latency, high‑stability US‑West‑to‑Asia‑Pacific connections—a digital bridge between two major economies.

  • Mature Supply Chain & Industry Ecosystem: Years of hyperscale data‑center construction have cultivated a complete ecosystem around Seattle—from engineering contractors and equipment suppliers to operational services and compliance auditing—ensuring high efficiency and low risk for data‑center deployment.

After the migration, I discovered additional advantages beyond expectations:

  • Foundational Defense Capability: The Seattle data center provides 20 Gbps DDoS protection by default, upgradable to 100 Gbps. For an online‑education platform that often faces minor attacks, this offers a valuable safety buffer. What impressed me most was the intelligence of the protection—it doesn’t mistakenly block legitimate traffic, a practical improvement over many “over‑sensitive” cloud providers.

  • Stable Hardware Performance: The E5‑2680 v4 configuration I chose demonstrated reassuring stability during continuous stress tests. Compared to the cloud servers I used before, RAKsmart’s dedicated servers showed almost negligible performance degradation under prolonged high loads. For compute‑intensive tasks like video transcoding and real‑time communication, this stability translates directly into consistent user experience.

  • Transparent Cost Structure: A fixed monthly fee covers all core resources, with no hidden bandwidth charges, API‑call fees, or overage costs. For mid‑sized businesses with steady growth, this predictable cost model greatly simplifies financial planning. Compared to pay‑as‑you‑go cloud services, our Seattle node’s monthly cost dropped by about 40 % while performance improved by at least 30 %.

4  Performance Leap in Real‑World Business Scenarios
Data alone is cold—it gains meaning only when translated into business outcomes. One month after migrating to RAKsmart’s Seattle data center, our key metrics changed as follows:

  • Average latency for US‑China interactive classes dropped from 247 ms to 162 ms—below the industry‑accepted real‑time interaction threshold (200 ms).

  • Video first‑screen load time shortened from 3.2 s to 1.8 s, with buffering rate down 67 %.

  • US users’ access speed to Chinese resources also improved: Silicon Valley engineers’ SSH connection latency fell from 310 ms to 195 ms.

  • User‑satisfaction scores for “network quality” rose from 3.2/5 to 4.5/5.

5 Seattle’s Unique Niche: Who Should Pay Attention to This Node?
Based on my experience, RAKsmart’s Seattle data center is particularly well‑suited for the following types of businesses:

  • Trans‑Pacific Bidirectional Operations: If your users are distributed across both China and the US and require frequent data exchange, Seattle’s central location and premium routes offer the best balance. Unlike pure‑US or pure‑China nodes, it genuinely “serves both ends.”

  • Latency‑Sensitive Mid‑Sized Applications: Game servers, real‑time trading systems, video‑conferencing platforms—applications with extremely low tolerance for network delay. The stable low latency of Seattle’s CN2 GIA line is far more valuable than the “occasional excellence” of ordinary routes.

  • US‑West‑Coast Nodes for Outbound Businesses: For companies whose primary market is in China but that need a US presence, Seattle offers better return routes to China than Los Angeles and a geographic advantage over East‑Coast nodes. This is especially true for teams that frequently manage US servers from China—SSH and remote‑desktop experiences improve significantly.

  • Growth‑Stage Companies Emphasizing Cost Control: Compared to equivalent configurations from AWS, Google Cloud, etc., in the Seattle region, RAKsmart offers clear cost advantages without complex billing models or surprise invoices. For businesses needing stable resources rather than elastic scaling, this is a more economical choice.

6 A Balanced View: Limitations and Recommendations
Naturally, no service is perfect. Based on my experience, potential users should note the following:

  • Not a Full‑Stack Cloud: If you require a rich PaaS offering (managed databases, message queues, AI platforms, etc.), RAKsmart may not be the best fit. It focuses on delivering high‑quality IaaS; other functions must be self‑built or integrated from third parties.

  • Cultural Differences in Technical Support: Compared to the standardized ticketing systems of large cloud vendors, RAKsmart’s support is more direct and technically oriented. Teams accustomed to “out‑of‑the‑box” solutions may need an adjustment period, but for teams with their own operational expertise, this can actually mean greater efficiency.

  • Boundaries of Applicability: If 99 % of your traffic originates from Europe or South America, Seattle may be less optimal than an East‑Coast node. But for trans‑Pacific traffic, especially between China and the US, its advantages are decisive.

Six months after moving to RAKsmart’s Seattle data center, I can confidently say this was not merely a server migration—it was a strategic infrastructure upgrade. For this specific scenario—requiring stable, low‑latency, cost‑effective trans‑Pacific network connectivity—it delivers a compelling solution.

The cloud‑computing world is shifting from “one‑size‑fits‑all” to “scenario‑optimal.” For my use case, RAKsmart’s Seattle data center is that “optimal solution.” It isn’t universal, but in what it excels at—connecting digital operations across the China‑US corridor—it accomplishes what many larger, more expensive providers have failed to do.

In global business architecture, the wisest choice isn’t always to follow the biggest brand, but to find the most suitable node. Seattle, that city in the Pacific Northwest, through RAKsmart’s premium network, has become the bridge connecting our users on both sides of the Pacific—and that is the technical foundation enabling our business’s continued growth.


If you find 【Customer Case Study: From 232ms to 158ms – How RAKsmart’s Seattle CN2 GIA Ended My Trans‑Pacific Latency Nightmare】 useful, please share it with your friends. Thank you!

Copy link